jordan pulse -

By Abdulrahman Khaldoun Shdeifat

In a revealing statement on Jordan Television, Speaker of the House Ahmad Al-Safadi disclosed that the Islamic Action Front (IAF) was offered positions within the permanent office. This revelation raises a crucial question: why did the IAF decline? This is where the core issue lies.

Al-Safadi’s remarks highlight a pivotal point for understanding the current political dynamics. The IAF must recognise that opportunities are fleeting, history waits for no one, and future leadership requires timely and decisive action.

The IAF, historically a formidable force in Jordanian politics, now faces legitimate questions about its stance and its ability to build alliances with other political blocs. Recent remarks by MP Ahmad Al-Qatawneh on “Sout Oman” shed light on critical issues that demand reflection.

Withdrawal and Concessions: A Persistent Pattern?

Why is the IAF often called upon to concede or withdraw from key positions? Who is pressuring them, and why do they consistently appear as victims on Jordan’s political stage? These questions underscore broader concerns about the IAF’s role in political alliances and its capacity to seize opportunities.

In truth, the IAF seems to have chosen self-exclusion, relinquishing important positions rather than becoming an integral part of the permanent office. With genuine efforts to collaborate with other blocs, the party could have played a more dynamic parliamentary role. Yet, before the Throne Speech session, the intense activity among other political parties highlighted a missed opportunity for the IAF.

A Shift Towards Programmatic Blocs?

Jordan’s parliamentary system needs a shift from interest-based blocs to programmatic ones, a move that could strengthen legislative action. Was the IAF ready for such a transformation? Did it possess the vision to activate its parliamentary role effectively?

Clear strategies and pragmatic approaches are essential to overcoming vague and populist policies. The Jordanian parliament requires actionable plans, yet the IAF seems unable to deliver, exposing itself to criticism.

Time for Reassessment

As the Jordanian parliament evolves, the IAF must reassess its strategies. Will it continue the cycle of concessions and withdrawals, or take bold steps that reflect its historical strength? Effective parliamentary work requires more than mere presence; it demands a genuine vision and unwavering will to drive change.

The IAF’s future lies in its ability to embrace opportunities, foster alliances, and shift from reactionary politics to proactive leadership. Only then can it reclaim its influential role in Jordan’s political arena.