Washington's Tactics at the 81st Session of the UN General Assembly

jordan pulse : By Dr. Rashed Al-Shashani
While acknowledging that the practical benefit of the United Nations lies primarily in securing high-level jobs with salaries capable of feeding an entire refugee camp of the injured, sick, hungry, and oppressed—who were driven to their plight by the domineering governance of certain national representatives while the international organization offers nothing but apologies for a lack of jurisdiction every time they fall victim to tyranny—a power like the United States will not miss the opportunity of this assembly. Amidst a tense atmosphere such as the one surrounding the Trump administration, Washington will actively maneuver behind the scenes, particularly regarding the Middle East crisis that is set to dominate the stage.
In the friction between the United States and France over the latter's role in the region—where Washington seeks to neutralize any power hindering Trump's maneuvers regarding Israeli recklessness and counteracting events via a 'reverse tactic'—this dynamic has become even more pronounced. This follows France's stance, joined by Britain, Germany, and Canada, regarding West Bank settlements that impede discussions on a Palestinian state, alongside the issue of UNIFIL forces (or their potential replacement) in Lebanon, as well as rising tensions in Yemen and Sudan, where the United States faces accusations of siding with the Rapid Support Forces. Trump views taking preemptive measures against such concerns as an urgent necessity before they turn into direct confrontations between Washington and permanent members of the Security Council.
Trump's prior actions clearly demonstrate his intent to distract Iran in a way that prevents it from responding as it usually would. From the F-35 deal with Saudi Arabia, along with leaks concerning an understanding with Iraq's Prime Minister regarding pro-Iranian factions retaining their weapons in exchange for a pledge not to target American interests, a second meeting with Al-Zaidi on the sidelines of this session appears poised to be the centerpiece of these arrangements.
These instances are not isolated. Barring the Palestinian delegation from entering the United States for a second time serves as a prime example, especially when contrasted with allowing a limited Iranian delegation to attend under strict restrictions. This indicates that Trump aims to shift attention away from Israel and its obligations, redirecting the focus toward Iran and its international commitments. In this context, Netanyahu's brief visit finds its explanation.
However, Trump does not want these friction points to overshadow the international assembly's meetings, allowing him to navigate the crisis surrounding the straits and the necessary concessions before global interests, which have been severely strained.
Trump aims to align two sides under his strategy by engaging Iran and regional states individually. He has alarmed regional powers with recent statements regarding strikes on Iran while simultaneously offering hope for an end to the conflict, hinting that Iran desires an agreement on his terms rather than those emphasized by Ghalibaf.
Yet, this outcome is inevitably guided under Washington's umbrella, even if achieved through bilateral or multilateral mediation. This shields Trump from confrontation with the UN as an organization, its member states, or global powers, especially amidst European dissatisfaction over Canada's desire for affiliated status, which Trump viewed as a hostile action and threatened with sanctions.
Through these bilateral understandings, Trump seeks to insulate himself from new complications that he cannot afford alongside domestic pressures and rising prices, which he has promised to address soon through decisive measures.
Returning to Washington's efforts to distract Iran and the world, military analysis suggests that his sudden interruption of leave may be tied to such goals. The 'Pizza Index' trick could serve as an effective tactic to a wave of panic across Iranian, Gulf, and global spheres, allowing him to elicit swift reactions from various parties—most notably Iranian military moves that, according to the plan, might lead to a misstep, granting the US military an opportunity to intervene decisively.
Source: Rum News Agency

By Dr. Rashed Al-Shashani
While acknowledging that the practical benefit of the United Nations lies primarily in securing high-level jobs with salaries capable of feeding an entire refugee camp of the injured, sick, hungry, and oppressed—who were driven to their plight by the domineering governance of certain national representatives while the international organization offers nothing but apologies for a lack of jurisdiction every time they fall victim to tyranny—a power like the United States will not miss the opportunity of this assembly. Amidst a tense atmosphere such as the one surrounding the Trump administration, Washington will actively maneuver behind the scenes, particularly regarding the Middle East crisis that is set to dominate the stage.
In the friction between the United States and France over the latter's role in the region—where Washington seeks to neutralize any power hindering Trump's maneuvers regarding Israeli recklessness and counteracting events via a 'reverse tactic'—this dynamic has become even more pronounced. This follows France's stance, joined by Britain, Germany, and Canada, regarding West Bank settlements that impede discussions on a Palestinian state, alongside the issue of UNIFIL forces (or their potential replacement) in Lebanon, as well as rising tensions in Yemen and Sudan, where the United States faces accusations of siding with the Rapid Support Forces. Trump views taking preemptive measures against such concerns as an urgent necessity before they turn into direct confrontations between Washington and permanent members of the Security Council.
Trump's prior actions clearly demonstrate his intent to distract Iran in a way that prevents it from responding as it usually would. From the F-35 deal with Saudi Arabia, along with leaks concerning an understanding with Iraq's Prime Minister regarding pro-Iranian factions retaining their weapons in exchange for a pledge not to target American interests, a second meeting with Al-Zaidi on the sidelines of this session appears poised to be the centerpiece of these arrangements.
These instances are not isolated. Barring the Palestinian delegation from entering the United States for a second time serves as a prime example, especially when contrasted with allowing a limited Iranian delegation to attend under strict restrictions. This indicates that Trump aims to shift attention away from Israel and its obligations, redirecting the focus toward Iran and its international commitments. In this context, Netanyahu's brief visit finds its explanation.
However, Trump does not want these friction points to overshadow the international assembly's meetings, allowing him to navigate the crisis surrounding the straits and the necessary concessions before global interests, which have been severely strained.
Trump aims to align two sides under his strategy by engaging Iran and regional states individually. He has alarmed regional powers with recent statements regarding strikes on Iran while simultaneously offering hope for an end to the conflict, hinting that Iran desires an agreement on his terms rather than those emphasized by Ghalibaf.
Yet, this outcome is inevitably guided under Washington's umbrella, even if achieved through bilateral or multilateral mediation. This shields Trump from confrontation with the UN as an organization, its member states, or global powers, especially amidst European dissatisfaction over Canada's desire for affiliated status, which Trump viewed as a hostile action and threatened with sanctions.
Through these bilateral understandings, Trump seeks to insulate himself from new complications that he cannot afford alongside domestic pressures and rising prices, which he has promised to address soon through decisive measures.
Returning to Washington's efforts to distract Iran and the world, military analysis suggests that his sudden interruption of leave may be tied to such goals. The 'Pizza Index' trick could serve as an effective tactic to a wave of panic across Iranian, Gulf, and global spheres, allowing him to elicit swift reactions from various parties—most notably Iranian military moves that, according to the plan, might lead to a misstep, granting the US military an opportunity to intervene decisively.
Source: Rum News Agency